who is bidding for the 2026 olympics

Deyi Xiabing

4 min read

·

14-03-2025

5

0

Share

The Race to 2026: A Look at the Bidding Cities for the Winter Olympics

The Winter Olympics, a spectacle of athletic prowess and international camaraderie, attract billions of viewers and generate substantial economic activity. Securing the right to host these Games is a coveted prize for cities around the globe, a testament to their ambition, infrastructure, and capacity for organization. The bidding process is rigorous, demanding extensive planning, substantial financial commitment, and a compelling vision for the future. As we look ahead to the 2026 Winter Olympics, let's examine the cities that initially vied for the honor and the factors that shaped their bids.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) initiated the bidding process for the 2026 Winter Games in 2015, following a series of withdrawals from previous bidding cycles. Concerns about escalating costs, environmental impacts, and a lack of public support had led several cities to abandon their pursuits. The IOC responded by introducing reforms aimed at simplifying the bidding process, reducing costs for host cities, and increasing sustainability considerations. These reforms were crucial in encouraging more cities to enter the competition for 2026.

Initially, a diverse range of cities expressed interest, representing different continents and showcasing varying approaches to Olympic hosting. However, the field eventually narrowed down to a selection of contenders who progressed through the various stages of evaluation. These included:

The Successful Bid: Milan-Cortina d'Ampezzo (Italy)

Milan and Cortina d'Ampezzo, two iconic Italian cities, emerged victorious in the final voting round, securing the 2026 Winter Olympics. Their joint bid presented a unique proposition, combining the urban dynamism of Milan with the breathtaking alpine scenery of Cortina d'Ampezzo. This partnership allowed them to leverage the existing infrastructure of Milan, including its international airport and extensive transportation network, while also showcasing the world-class ski resorts and winter sports facilities of the Dolomites.

The Milan-Cortina bid highlighted several key strengths:

• Existing Infrastructure: Milan's robust infrastructure significantly reduced the need for new constructions, mitigating costs and environmental impact. Cortina d'Ampezzo, a long-standing winter sports destination, already possessed many necessary venues.
• Strong Governmental Support: The Italian government provided unwavering support for the bid, demonstrating a commitment to funding and facilitating the Games' success.
• Sustainable Practices: The bid emphasized sustainability, focusing on utilizing existing infrastructure, minimizing environmental impact, and promoting responsible tourism.
• Economic Impact: The organizers presented a comprehensive plan to maximize the economic benefits of the Games, generating jobs, attracting investment, and leaving a lasting legacy for the region.
• Shared Vision: The collaboration between Milan and Cortina demonstrated a shared vision and a commitment to working together towards a common goal.

Cities That Withdrew or Were Eliminated:

Several other cities initially expressed interest but ultimately withdrew from the bidding process or were eliminated during the evaluation stages. Understanding their reasons provides valuable insights into the complexities of hosting the Olympics. Some notable examples include:

• Stockholm-Åre (Sweden): The Swedish bid, combining the capital city with the renowned ski resort of Åre, faced challenges securing sufficient political and public support. Concerns about costs and the potential environmental impact contributed to its eventual withdrawal.
• Calgary (Canada): Calgary, a veteran of the Winter Olympics (1988), had launched a bid but ultimately failed to secure enough public support in a referendum. The high costs associated with hosting the Games and concerns about potential financial burdens on taxpayers were cited as significant obstacles.
• Graz (Austria): The Austrian city of Graz considered a bid but ultimately decided against it, recognizing the significant financial and logistical challenges involved.
• Sapporo (Japan): Sapporo, a previous host of the Winter Olympics (1972), considered a bid, but withdrew due to various political and economic factors.
• Erzurum (Turkey): Erzurum, aiming to become the first Turkish city to host the Winter Olympics, made a bid but ultimately failed to progress through the selection process.

The reasons for these withdrawals and eliminations vary, but several recurring themes emerged:

• Financial Concerns: The enormous costs associated with hosting the Olympics remain a major deterrent for many cities. Building new venues, upgrading infrastructure, and ensuring security require substantial financial investments, often leading to public debate and opposition.
• Environmental Concerns: The environmental impact of the Games, including construction, transportation, and waste generation, is a growing concern. Cities are under increasing pressure to demonstrate a commitment to sustainability and minimizing their carbon footprint.
• Lack of Public Support: Securing broad public support is crucial for a successful bid. Negative public perception, concerns about costs, or a lack of enthusiasm can significantly impact a city's chances.
• Political Instability: Political factors and uncertainties can hinder a city's ability to successfully bid for the Games. Instability or lack of government support can make it difficult to meet the IOC's requirements.
• Competition: The competitive nature of the bidding process means that only the strongest and most well-prepared bids are likely to succeed. Cities need to demonstrate a comprehensive plan, robust infrastructure, and strong community support.

The Future of Olympic Bidding:

The 2026 bidding process reflects a shift in the IOC's approach to selecting host cities. The reforms introduced to simplify the process, reduce costs, and emphasize sustainability are intended to make bidding more attractive and manageable for cities. While financial and environmental concerns remain paramount, the emphasis on long-term legacy and community engagement is becoming increasingly important.

The success of the Milan-Cortina bid demonstrates that a collaborative approach, leveraging existing infrastructure, and prioritizing sustainability can significantly improve a city's chances of winning the right to host the Winter Olympics. As the Games approach, the world will watch to see how Milan and Cortina deliver on their promises and create a lasting legacy for future generations. The 2026 Winter Olympics will undoubtedly be a significant event, and the journey to reach this point highlights the challenges and triumphs of the Olympic bidding process. Future bidding cycles will likely continue to reflect the evolving priorities of the IOC and the changing landscape of global events.